Photographing a young girl nearly or completely naked has been the modus operandi for fashion publications for eons. Since Vanity Fair straddles the fence between an entertainment and/or fashion title, they used a teen star whose age we actually know instead of a random model this time around, so we're all allowed to freak out a little bit.
In regards to the recent controversial images of Miley Ray Cyrus, VF issued a statement this morning:
"Miley's parents and/or minders were on the set all day. Since the photo was taken digitally, they saw it on the shoot and everyone thought it was a beautiful and natural portrait of Miley."
Puh-lease. My BS Barometer is registering a whopper that is off the charts. Annie Leibovitz and VF are doing their best to pretend like they can't imagine we are all so filthy for thinking that there was anything suggesting a modicum of sexuality... because her dad supervised the whole thing, knowingly sexually exploiting minors is one of those things that most people are opposed to.
Throwing the 15 year old in front of a camera topless in a bed sheet with tousled hair and pouty lips suggests an atmosphere of sin. I have no problems with sexuality, but the PR folks at VF should really stop trying to play this card of shock and ignorance of the issues at hand.
Everybody recognizes sex when they see it - humans are hardwired for it and media outlets are experts at pushing our buttons in that particular arena. The fact that her dad thinks it's a purty picture that he would be proud to "hang on his own walls" is among other things: sad, disturbing and incredibly creepy.
At least the folks at the Disney Channel seem to have a realistic grasp on the circumstances when they responded to the images with:
"...a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines."






Recent Comments